Come è giusto che sia in stile blog sono alquanto incazzato su questa faccenda del nucleare.
Sono incazzato e stanco di leggere i commenti ai video e ai post dei blogger che portano conferme che il nucleare è più svantaggioso che vantaggioso e che dimostrano come ce lo vogliano ficcare in culo e in testa a forza!
Volete il contraddittorio? Allora smettete di leggere e andate altrove! Mi sono rotto le palle di sentire commenti di democrazia in un Paese che la democrazia non l' ha mai avuta! Adesso volete la par condicio e la verità? Per anni abbiamo messo al potere l' unico esempio di politico al mondo padrone di: tre televisioni, tre giornali, una squadra di calcio, compagnie di assicurazioni, centri commerciali, banche e chi più ne ha più ne metta e sul nucleare volete il contradditorio perchè avete paura che qualcuno vi dica che in caso di incidente vostro figlio potrebbe nascere così:
Allora andatevene AFFANCULO! Mi sono rotto le palle di sentire commenti del tipo: "massì tanto se le vogliono fare le fanno", "ma tanto se esplode una centrale nucleare in Francia anche noi siamo nella merda", "siamo ipocriti perchè compriamo dall' estero l' energia nucleare però vogliamo non si produca qui". Ma come cazzo siete messi?!
"Se le vogliono make do "We'll see!" If it explodes in France ... "a Google search for" French nuclear accidents "and see how many results google finds, nuclear accidents have already broken out but we are all alive! L 'Did you notice?! Then I care that in France! I'm not the boss of the world as we do all Italians have to do! Here, I and many Italians, do not want the nuclear power plants, We are we hypocrites?! Who said that our governments scheming to do with who had the 'nuclear energy? we who pay them, why the fuck are selling out the country who want to' country? This they did! They sold our debt to the French and now they are part owners of our national sovereignty that is why we require the purchase nuclear power plants. BUT THERE WANT TO WAKE UP!? Once no shit, but now the 'information c' is! C 'is the internet, turn a little here and there and then we reason with your neurons, if they are not fried at all, and you will have responses that are close to the truth.
When I was a kid in the '80s we talked with fear of nuclear power. We had eyes Hiroshima and Nagasaki and Chernobyl in 1986 even cooler.
why a referendum in Italy (November 1987 referendum to abolish the procedure for the localization of nuclear power stations, for the abolition of subsidies to regions and common sites of nuclear power plants and for the abolition of participation in the implementation of Enel of nuclear power plants abroad) has stated the desire for the majority of Italians (about 80% to 65% who went to the polls) to live in a country without nuclear power.
It 's interesting to note that the referendum has not only manifested an opposition to nuclear power in Italy, but also a prohibition on cooperation with foreign countries for Enel ban upheld and even extended in time and expanded in collaboration.
Avevamo sfiducia e paura del nucleare e ci dicevano che facevamo bene ad averne e ora? Ora che siamo più maturi e informati e che certe cazzate non ce le dovremmo più bere cercano di ritrattare la nostra coscienza, la nostra libertà di espressione già esercitata in un referendum con spot del genere:
E VOGLIAMO ASCOLTARE QUESTA FINTA DEMOCRAZIA!? Qui fingono di chiederci un parere quando con la pubblicità ce ne hanno già dato uno e poi? Se anche 50 milioni di italiani scrivessero al forum che se la possono ficcare nel culo la loro energia nucleare pensate che gliene fregherebbe qualcosa di discutere con noi?! Non fatevi ingannare o comprare! L' Italia ha già detto la sua sulla questione STOP! Non c' è altro da dire. Non si fa sempre quel cazzo che vogliono loro! Non in democrazia!
Io non vi farò il gioco dei pro e dei contro, vi metterò davanti solo i contro poi se vi interessano i pro informatevi per conto vostro.
L'energia nucleare è una fonte energetica che viene prodotta nelle centrali nucleari mediante il bombardamento di uranio con neutroni: il nucleo dell'uranio viene così diviso in due nuclei più piccoli ( fissione nucleare ) e, per effetto domino, genera nuovi nuclei che a loro volta, bombardati da altri nuclei di uranio , danno rise to the famous nuclear chain reaction.
COSTS: Nuclear power in Italy and around the world design and production costs are very high, as high technology and necessary expertise for projects of a plant, which must necessarily ciated public finance (ie citizens) . And, once construction is completed, you must add the cost of entry into military security against terrorism or natural events (for example, the big fire that hit Moscow and the surrounding area and which threatened to reach the area of \u200b\u200bChernobyl is that the waste storage of the same): In this context it seems inevitable intervention (ie an increase) on our bill electricity. Moreover, it is undeniable link between the use of uranium and production of weapons, even in developing countries and governments are unstable or tend to "aggressive" means a situation that worries a good part of the public. As always hang
d 'as the' America when it seems to them, let us take it 's time as us: the United States operating 109 reactors with a power of 99 GW. The last order of construction of a nuclear reactor built actually goes back 23 years ago. Over the past 30 years, the reactors ordered and then canceled for the rising costs were 123, while in 1990, in Canada, the plan to build 10 reactors by 2014, has been canceled. The central
Yankee Rowe (Mass.), closed in 1991, was built in 1960 at a cost, in 1993 U.S. dollars, 186 million, provides for the complete dismantling (not yet completely finished) at a cost of $ 370 million, nearly double what spent to build it. Its duration was then 31 years.
In England in 2002, British Energy was in crisis because the liberalization of electricity markets had made nuclear power uncompetitive. It was saved from bankruptcy thanks to a critical public support of over EUR 6 billion, in part, to cover liabilities related to management of nuclear waste and the future dismantling of nuclear plants.
In France: In January 2005 the Court of Auditors French found that compared with € 13 billion of reserves reported by Electricité de France for the decommissioning of nuclear and radioactive waste management, there are actually only 2.3 billion of assets dedicated to the purpose.
From these examples it is the doubt that nuclear power is an industry where it is easy to download costs on the future and the community.
The cost of waste disposal is greater than the manufacturing cost of the plant, and one must not forget that in Italy there are uranium deposits, and this would create a new dependence (Uranium instead of oil). ( source )
POLLUTANT: a nuclear power plant produces large quantities of waste that can not be disposed of and need much water then download polluting rivers and seas.
SAFETY: no insurance company ever will ensure a nuclear power plant. With the flair for which they scam, since they are the first to use, c 'is to be trusted. Security is relative and in case of an accident (since the 'no man is perfect) you're fucked! It 's like saying that there are very few aircraft accidents, are more rail and even before the engines. Very true, but if it falls dead on a plane is guaranteed while the other two cases no. You think? POLLUTANT: a nuclear power plant produces large quantities of waste that can not be disposed of and need much water then download polluting rivers and seas.
Agricultural activities in the area of \u200b\u200bChernobyl will be possible in 200 years. L 'area where the exploded reactor 4 of the Chernobyl will be safe in 20,000 years.
LOCATION: in Italy we are at medium to high seismic risk, the 'only region not at risk is Sardinia . After seeing what they did the previous earthquakes, and especially the 'Aquila. You entrusted to the public to build a nuclear plant? If so, where would you do?
Nobody wants a nuclear plant close to him, much less a storage of radioactive waste. You would live here:
?????? CONSTRUCTION, AND ELIMINATION TIME: to build a nuclear power plant it takes a 'huge quantities of cement, cement production is one of the causes of global warming. It takes seven years to design a nuclear power plant and 7 others to build it and make it active. Then another 7 years to recover the 'energy expended to build this plant. 20/21 years and then require it to become an instrument produttivo.La average lifespan of 439 reactors currently in funzione nel mondo è di 21 anni. Si stanno smantellando 80 centrali che hanno una vita media di 32 anni. Lo smantellamento è molto costoso e richiede anni per la ribonifica dei terreni e la distruzione della centrale.
L' URANIO E' LIMITATO: L' Agenzia Internazionale per l' Energia Atomica afferma che tra il 2025 e il 2035 l' uranio si esaurirà nelle centrali nucleari e il suo prezzo salirà, sarà il nuovo petrolio. Le risorse di uranio potrebbe essere stato sovrastimate. L’Agenzia internazionale dell’energia atomica e l’Agenzia dell’energia nucleare (NEA) pubblicano stime biennali delle risorse di uranio a livello mondiale nel cosiddetto Libro Rosso. Michael Dittmar, un fisico delle particelle al CERN di Ginevra, in Svizzera, la scorsa settimana ha rilasciato una analisi critica dei dati e ha sostenuto che le ragioni dietro la fluttuazione delle risorse stimate in questi ultimi anni non sono chiare. I proprietari delle miniere di uranio, la scorsa settimana hanno aumentato il rischio di penuria di materia prima. ( fonte ) LE SCORIE NUCLEARI: Purtroppo le scorie nucleari sono un altro aspetto critico del nucleare. Non possono essere distrutte e l'unica soluzione, per il momento, sembra essere lo stoccaggio per migliaia di anni in depositi geologici o ingegneristici. La ricerca di un deposito sicuro è tra i principali objectives of the EU and the U.S.. It takes years of studies and major investment in detection of storage solutions for hundreds of thousands of years. ( source)
TERRORISM: We live in an age when few people can do great damage to humanity. The memory of the tragedy of 11 September 2001 to the skyscrapers of the World Trade Center was a severe shock for the whole of Western society. The risk that nuclear power plants are used as targets for acts of terrorism or dirty bombs is very realistic. E 'lawful and rational concern. New nuclear plants will have to include this aspect right from the planning stage. (Source )
TRANSPORT OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL: The transport of radioactive and nuclear material is one of the most critical aspects of "security" issue. During transport, as well as the opposition of the people who will go with radioactive cargo ships or trains near their homes, there is a risk of accidents and terrorist attacks. In France, the special trains carrying nuclear waste under the cover of "tanks" and mounted policemen. The route of the train is constantly changing knowledge of people living near railways. For these reasons, waste repositories should reside near nuclear plants thus avoiding the need transport of waste. The technological and scientific research has not yet found a way to destroy the waste within the same nuclear power plants. We are still waiting for answers to that effect. ( source) And if there is enough there are also some interesting videos of limited duration. The first two that I submit are from the documentary created by Beppe Grillo in collaboration with the Greenpeace Earth reloaded "if you want to hear real scientists and experts and not the Cancronesi Spa Umberto I recommend this piece that concerns what we are talking about and if you want to go over on youtube you should find, in pieces, all the documentary
E poi le considerazioni di Rubbia riguardo il nucleare:
Insomma, possiamo concludere che se anche non ci fosse nessun' altra alternativa al nucleare di sicuro l' Italia, per tutta una serie di problemi suoi organizzativi e che si è trovata (territoriali), non è la nazione adatta per iniziare un progetto così rischioso. Plus there are alternatives: geothermal, wind, hydroelectric power, solar energy, reducing energy consumption, more efficient systems (the most isolated homes, heating systems more efficient, better appliances, lighting, low / high efficiency).
So let's not screwed on this point please!
we have already said no to nuclear power in Italy. They want to give a damn?! All right, then find the courage to say we are a dictatorship! We are cowards, La Russa!? We hide behind a finger?! But you, who you claim to be liberals and Democrats and you move as the worst squads?!
We are the revolution! And When we ask you:
"nuclear?"
I recommend, the answer is ONE:
0 comments:
Post a Comment