How To Get Shiny Starter Pokemon In Emerald

CATERINA SOFFICI E LA POLEMICA CON GAD LERNER

Sul "Fatto Quotidiano" il 21/12/2010 a pagina 18 Caterina Soffici rimprovera Lerner così:

" Gad Lerner su Vanity Fair dedica la sua rubrica a indignarsi contro chi ha osato criticare la pubblicità della Tim con Belén. Nella fattispecie se la prende con la sottoscritta perché a giugno, quindi ben prima delle recenti polemiche sul calo delle vendite e sulla sostituzione della signorina Rodriguez come testimonial, avevo raccontato nel corso di un incontro pubblico di non aver comprato la chiavetta della Tim perché disturbata da quella pubblicità, che ritenevo maschilista, offensiva dell’immagine femminile, l’espressione massima insomma di quella “retrograda sottocultura italiana” che Lerner si vanta di denunciare nella sua trasmissione televisiva. Questo succedeva in un convegno organizzato dal comitato “Pari o Dispare” alla Statale di Milano, con partecipazione di Emma Bonino e molte altre donne delle professioni e della società civile, impegnate in una battaglia controgli stereotipi di genere, le discriminazioni sul lavoro, in famiglia. Scrive l’indignato Lerner: “Non I associate it with a campaign to boycott the poor Puritan, Belén nice, especially now that it purports to criticize the decline in sales of Tim. "
I would like to first reassure the employee Telecom, Gad Lerner, which I then bought the stick despite Tim Belén, because the offer was the best for my needs. Thus, at least on my part I have helped to keep sales high (and his stipend). I would also like to clarify that this is not puritanical and politically correct campaigns. The battles to leave the ethical Binetti and CL and there is nothing personal against the poor Belén, creator of the victim rather than advertising.
"we Mica transform all of whom are bigots because of a ruling class of whoremongers? "Lerner joked. Oh no, my dear. Too easy to pass off as "bigot" who criticize an advertisement where a girl gets rammed half naked on billboards ten feet by six. This is not the naked bothers you, dear Lerner. Never mind the nude and who cares if it is not consonant with the standards of decency in accordance with the average Italian family. The problem lies elsewhere, in the image that gives women. In advertising, women are always alluring, and sexual objects more or less hidden, and then presented them all as prostitutes,
always ready and always on sale. Here the objection is not about decency or less advertising with Belén. It would be too easy to personalize the problem: Belén and its history with the Crown, his frequent night and snorted cocaine. Never mind the facts of personal Belén, let the complaint to the Rai and sermons to the defenders of public morals. Here we discuss
dignity, gender discrimination, the use of the body of a beautiful girl of telephone charges to advertise 2 × 1 (another clear reference to gender), this continuous and incessant manipulation of the collective to which she must be nice to please the male. Beautiful and desirable. Grave not understand this difference, because women lose their sense of image also means losing the perception of certain rights. And if the violence against women show no sign of decline, we must seek the roots of this macho culture, often misogynistic, patriarchal and drooling. But this is difficult to make that clear to some men. Lerner wrote to find Belén "very attractive as an icon of female beauty", especially when "in shorts pulls the kickoff of the game." Even Vespa's attraction to the neckline of the evening's final Avallone Campiello. Not that he was authorized to make appraisals
live TV. But it is difficult to understand than some men. " Catherine Soft ( source)

For my part I think this: the premise that after I will give right of reply to Lerner citing his response to this article, I can say about the 'image of women in this country is all good and true what you write, Catherine Soft. That 's what I and many other people would like to hear from more often by journalists and politicians (especially the latter because, unfortunately, to change the country you have to pass by them).


So what 's the problem?


No glaring problem, maybe I'm too attentive to detail, or try sleeping in the 'egg. But c 'is a phrase which, in my opinion, very out of place in all this reasoning very agreeable, sensible and interesting.
this sentence: "I want to first reassure the employee Telecom, Gad Lerner, which I then bought the stick despite Tim Belen, because the 'offer was better for my needs."


And no dear Catherine. In my opinion in these two lines you have disgraced all that good speech. In these few lines c 'it' s the woman in subjection dela 'man and all the' placing 'the individual consumer market.
The battles are not buying making or buying as prostitutes, Your speech seems so much of the discourse that Benigni said when asked how he could be producing the film "Pinocchio" from the Medusa film company that was and is Silvio Berlusconi, as he always spoke of evil. He candidly replied: "I would not speak well of Silvio Berlusconi to his shoulders! As an entrepreneur we all know that is an extraordinary man ... so why not take the best part? And if you do not distribute the jellyfish do? I move in another country? " ( source)

I, I was a journalist, I would have replied:" If you were consistent and not a talker like many in his world, yes! Should move to another country to produce or give up to a billion, as much certainly does not die of hunger. "


Dear Catherine, easy to talk with a full stomach but if you buy at the end of the stick Tim you'll keep Belen and many other two-bit soubrette who besmirch the femininity of the woman on TV.


know what the problem 'is?

that thanks to people like you and eventually buy Benigni and then they buy without making a financial sacrifice to stay true to their correct positions with indignation, but I will have to put up with the world built around us.


As you know, the world of the rich and is made from them ... and you are certainly poor. This episode of "Annozero" at least Lerner 's admitted silencing throughout the study. And 'he was more consistent.


who is without sin cast the first stone.


Finally, for the record and replicate it below the public response Gad Lerner from his blog:

" too, as I wrote, I find the bad publicity the beautiful and innocent Belém. However, given the wrong proposal at the meeting but announced the boycott, I learn now, not implemented by Catherine Soft. Perfectly free motivate me to think that it was the defense of my generous compensation: it is a topic frequently, this joint we frequent the salons, where I also usually give you a dose of friendliness ed'ironia more than I reserve the ' Former Head of the cultural pages of the "Journal" of Victor Felts and Maurizio Belpietro. The enthusiasm of the newbies and neophytes, however, is appreciated. " Gad Lerner ( source)