Harman Kardon Dvd Player Cant Hear Talking

WHAT MAKES AN ILLEGAL WAR?

Declare a "preventive" war is absurd and illegal outside of any conception of law intenazionale.
There is even a law school that admits the concept.
The United Nations and the U.S. are responsible for international order.
So if the UN does not slavishly what is commanded by Washington, not to say that the UN has failed, means that Washington has failed in his attempts to influence the Security Council. (Deo gratias and that even countries such as Guinea the Cameroon and Angola not buy are made from dollar diplomacy)

justify armed intervention in the U.S. because of alleged inefficiency of the United Nations would be like justify a coup in Italy because of the alleged inefficiency of Ciampi and Parliament.

these institutions are and must be respected.
The Republican administrations of the United States have always mocked the UN and its resolutions and the U.S. currently are the only country in the world to be condemned by the World Court for acts of international terrorism and has vetoed the resolution of the Security Council urged Member States to observe international law.

Noam Chomsky, renowned U.S. professor writes:

Reagan-US war against Nicaragua. E 'incontrovertible because there are a number of major international dictates OMPETENT: the International Court of Justice, the World Court, the UN Security Council. This is a case which admits of no dispute, at least among those who have a minimum account for the international law, human rights, justice etc..
Il caso del Nicaragua è specialmente rilevante, non solo per il suo carattere incontrovertibile, ma perché offre un precedente su come uno Stato che rispetta la legge risponderebbe ( di fatto, su come rispose ) di fronte a un caso di terrorismo internazionale che non ammette discussione. Un caso di terrorismo che, per certo, fu più estremo degli avvenimenti dell'11 settembre. La guerra USA-Reagan contro il Nicaragua terminò con decine di migliaia di assassinati e il paese completamente rovinato, forse per sempre.

Il Nicaragua rispose, ma i nicaraguensi non risposero bombardando Washington. Risposero portando gli USA di fronte al Tribunale Mondiale in una causa in cui non ebbero difficoltà nel trovare tests. The World Court gave reason to Nicaragua , condemning what he called "illegal exercise of power" is synonymous with international terrorism. The Court demanded the U.S. end of the crimes and pay reparations (in Nicaragua). The North American , in response, rejected the ruling of the Court with absolute contempt and announced that no longer accept the jurisdiction of that court. The
Nicaragua then resorted to the UN Security Council , where he discussed a resolution where asked all States to respect international law. did not name names, but the whole world knew. The U.S. vetoed . Currently the U.S. is the only country in the world to be condemned by the World Court for acts of international terrorism and has vetoed the resolution of the Security Council urged Member States to observe international law . The
Nicaragua resorted then the UN General Assembly, where the veto does not technically exist, but where a vote is tantamount to degativo U.S. veto.
The General Assembly passed a similar resolution: only voted against U.S., Israel and El Salvador . The following year, he returned to Nicaragua the present case before the House Genarale UN . On this occasion the U.S. could rely on the support of Israel , so two votes opposed to respect for international law . At that point, Nicaragua had exhausted all legal remedies available and had come to the conclusion that these appeals do not work in a world dominated by force.

This is to explain not only the sad affair of Nicaragua, but the whole attitude of the Republican administrations against U.S. law and international law: absolute contempt.